Kamala Harris’s Facebook Spending:
An Act of Election Interference?
With less than 30 days until the election, the Biden-Harris Department of Justice is filing an unprecedented lawsuit against me and the Commonwealth of Virginia, for appropriately enforcing a 2006 law to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls.
Virginians – and Americans – will…
— Glenn Youngkin (@GlennYoungkin) October 11, 2024
Recent reports reveal that the Kamala Harris campaign has invested millions—$11 million to $16 million—on a Facebook page with just 1,000 followers. This investment should be considered more than just marketing; it should be viewed as a calculated act of election interference that shapes how undecided voters perceive the candidates.
The Facts Behind the Spending
What may appear at first glance as frivolous spending by the Harris campaign may instead be a well-orchestrated attempt to manipulate what media and content undecided voters are exposed to. By pumping money into social media advertising, the campaign has the power to control the narrative that voters see. This isn’t just about promoting Harris; it’s about creating a digital environment that paints her in the best possible light while minimizing the visibility of content that supports Trump or challenges Democratic viewpoints.
This approach should be seen as a form of election interference, as it aims to bias the perception of candidates right before voters make up their minds. When undecided voters log on to platforms like Facebook, they aren’t just seeing organic posts from their friends and family; they’re seeing a flood of well-funded content designed to sway their views. With this strategy, Harris’s campaign is not just competing for votes but actively working to skew the media landscape to its advantage.
Why This Matters
The influence of social media on public opinion has grown exponentially in recent years, making it a powerful tool in any election. When a campaign spends millions to dominate the online narrative, it directly impacts how voters perceive the race. By controlling what information is readily available, the Harris campaign is influencing not only those who are already supporters but also those who are still undecided, effectively guiding them toward a predetermined conclusion.
In a fair democratic process, voters should have access to balanced information that allows them to make informed choices. But if one side is using its financial resources to create a tilted playing field, then the very foundation of that democratic process is compromised. This tactic is no different than the media’s biased coverage, which already leans in favor of the Democratic candidate while constantly criticizing Trump.
The Bigger Picture: The Democratic Strategy
This massive expenditure on a nearly irrelevant Facebook page is not only about boosting Harris’s image—it’s about drowning out Trump’s message. The mainstream media and social platforms have already shown a bias against Trump, often highlighting any misstep he makes while glossing over or ignoring the flaws of Kamala. Now, with Harris’s campaign pouring millions into social media ads, the scales are tipped even further.
This strategy is yet another example of how the Democrats use every tool at their disposal to manipulate voter sentiment. Whether it’s biased fact-checking during debates, selective news coverage, or social media ad blitzes, the objective is the same: make the Democratic nominee look like the only rational choice and portray Trump as an unsuitable and unstable candidate.
We Must Call It What It Is—Election Interference
As voters, we must demand a fair electoral process where information is not manipulated by financial power plays. The Harris campaign’s massive spending on Facebook and Instagram should be recognized for what it is—a deliberate attempt to influence voter perception in a way that undermines the principles of a free and fair election. It’s a modern form of election interference, one that manipulates the information landscape to favor one candidate while unfairly maligning the other.
This issue needs to be called out, not just for its impact on this election but for the dangerous precedent it sets for future campaigns. If we don’t address this now, we risk allowing our democratic process to be distorted by the highest bidder, rather than determined by the voice of the people.
– F.W
Victims of Hurricane Helene & their donation funds
Many mainstream media outlets are sharing people’s stories but not their donation links.
By sharing our article, you not only help us spread the word, but you allow these victim’s donation funds to be seen.
House fire after 8-10ft of storm surge
St. Petersburg, fl
HEARTBREAKING: St. Petersburg local & patriot Nancy Cotto’s house burned down in Hurricane Helene destroying everything they owned. Due to the flooding, emergency services were delayed by 5 hours and in that time, their home was gone.
Please consider donating at the link below… pic.twitter.com/KyHU3OurOa
— Adam Francisco (@adamfrancisco_) September 28, 2024
Real Bread is donating bread and supplies to victims
Gofundme deleted their fund
Rebuilding homes for families
Baxley, ga
Couple lost entire home to water
Florida
Spooky Season










Sources
Why the Harris campaign has spent $16 million on a Facebook page with 1000 followers
Why the Harris campaign has spent $11 million on a Facebook page with 1,000 followers
The fine print I have to include for my own protection:
The following text presents the author’s opinions and interpretations of events without intending to cause harm or defame any individuals, organizations, or entities mentioned. While the author has provided sources to support their claims, readers are encouraged to conduct their research and employ critical thinking to form their own conclusions.
Source Bias Information
Here you can check the Bias of the News Sources presented above.
I use Ground News when possible to find the bias of each source. Today, that lean right because the left was not reporting this.

And if you’d like to try Ground News! Use our link below for 15% off. Plans are only $0.83/month!
Ground News
